Running employee focus groups properly: A practical, data-informed guide

Diverse business team engaged in lively discussion and smiling during a meeting in a modern office setting

I was recently tagged in a post, off the back of the recent Make a Difference Leaders’ lunch asking:

Have you ever run listening circles or focus groups with employees to really understand what’s behind increased sick days, presenteeism, and reduced productivity? What works, what doesn’t, and is it better to bring in a third party?

It’s a great question – and one I see organisations wrestling with all the time through my work at Ridgeflow Performance with global organisations through to startups, schools and public sector organisations including the NHS.

From my experience, there are three main ways organisations approach listening circles and focus groups:

  1. Running them internally as a leader or manager
  2. Bringing in an external facilitator
  3. Using an external partner to train internal facilitators (especially in large or global organisations)

Each can work brilliantly. Each can also fall flat. The difference is rarely the format – it’s the intent, preparation, trust, and follow-through.

Here’s what I’ve seen actually work.

1. Running focus groups internally: trust comes first

If you’re planning to run focus groups or listening circles yourself as a leader, founder, or manager, the first question isn’t:

What questions should we ask?

It’s:

Do we actually have psychological safety and trust in place?

If people don’t already feel safe:

  • Speaking honestly
  • Challenging upwards
  • Talking about workload, stress, mistakes, or conflict

Then a focus group won’t suddenly create that safety overnight. In fact, it can do the opposite — it can increase fear if people feel exposed or unsure how their words will be used.

A few realities to check before you run anything internally:

  • Is this the first time you’ve ever spoken about wellbeing or lived experience at work?
  • Have you ever run open one-to-ones about stress, workload, or support?
  • Or will this feel completely out of the blue?
  • If it is new, that’s okay – but it must be properly contextualised.

For example:

  • “We’re doing well, and we want to fine-tune how we support you as we grow.”
  • “We know workloads are intense right now, and we want to properly understand what support would actually help you.”

The framing matters enormously. People need to hear:

“This is for you – not being done to you.”

Be radically transparent about where the data goes

One of the biggest sources of cynicism I see is:

“We’ve been surveyed for years and nothing ever changes.”

So be clear upfront:

  • Will this turn into a report?
  • Will leadership see individual comments or only themes?
  • What decisions will this data inform?
  • What won’t it be used for?

Trust collapses fastest when people feel their honesty disappears into a black hole.

2. Data first, listening second: why quantitative + qualitative must work together

One of the most powerful ways to use listening circles is not to start with them – but to run them alongside your existing data.

That means understanding:

  • Sickness absence and presenteeism
  • Performance data, OKRs and KPIs
  • Engagement survey results
  • Wellbeing data
  • Themes emerging from manager one-to-ones (if these are being captured consistently)

On their own, these numbers can tell you what is happening – but can miss why.

Listening circles are what help you understand:

  • What sits behind rising sick days
  • Why performance is dipping in certain teams
  • What workload pressure actually looks like day-to-day
  • Where communication or role clarity is breaking down

In practice, I’ve found listening circles are most effective when they are shaped by survey data or performance metrics. The data highlights the pressure points – and the listening sessions help you understand the lived reality underneath them.

It’s the combination of:

  • Quantitative data (the patterns)
  • And qualitative insight (the human experience)

that allows organisations to design interventions that actually land.

3. Using an external facilitator: safety through neutrality

Many organisations bring in an external facilitator because:

  • They’ve never done this before
  • They don’t feel equipped to handle difficult feedback
  • They want people to feel safer being honest
  • They want to show they’re serious about listening

This is often a very smart move.

People commonly share things with an external facilitator that they would never say to:

  • Their line manager
  • Their senior leadership team
  • HR

That doesn’t mean they don’t trust their organisation — it simply reflects power dynamics. When pay, promotion, and job security sit upstream, complete honesty can feel risky.

But the external brief matters enormously

An external facilitator is only effective if:

  • The purpose is crystal clear
  • The leadership intent is genuine
  • The organisation is actually prepared to hear uncomfortable truths

I will almost always spend time with senior leaders before running focus groups to align on:

  • What they genuinely want to understand
  • What they suspect might come up
  • What they are realistically willing to act on

Because listening without action is often worse than not listening at all.

4. Listening doesn’t always mean “small rooms”

Listening can happen through:

  • Focus groups
  • 1-to-1 interviews
  • Large workshops shaped around survey data
  • And more!

For example, in one recent programme:

  • We surveyed staff in advance
  • Identified themes like belonging, peer support, and communication
  • Then built a full-day training experience directly around those insights
  • Group discussions fed directly into leadership decision-making

It wasn’t labelled a “listening circle” — but it functioned as one. 

We surveyed staff on these metrics before the workshop, and comparing the results to surveying them after the session, we saw a clear improvement in key areas the Directors brought me in for: 

  • +24.8% increase in awareness of how to promote wellbeing among colleagues
  • +20.1% increase in confidence starting wellbeing conversations
  • +17.7% increase in knowing steps to take if concerned about a colleague
  • +7.5% increase in recognising when a colleague might be struggling
  • +8.6% increase in recognising personal early warning signs

5. Training internal facilitators: the scalable, global model

For large or global organisations, external delivery alone isn’t always realistic or culturally appropriate.

Different:

  • Languages
  • Cultural norms
  • Power distances
  • Communication styles

require people on the ground who truly understand the context.

In these cases, the most powerful approach I’ve seen is:

Training internal facilitators to run focus groups in their own regions.

When done well, this includes training people to:

  • Hold psychologically safe conversations
  • Stay neutral and non-judgemental
  • Avoid steering or defending leadership
  • Prevent sessions becoming blame forums
  • Keep focus on insight, not venting
  • How to be in the right headspace and have strong levels of Emotional Intelligence

Once the data is gathered, it can be:

  • Thematically analysed
  • Combined with survey and performance data
  • Fed back into leadership strategy
  • And turned into targeted, measurable interventions

6. The final piece most organisations miss: closing the loop

You can run the best focus groups and listening circles in the world — but if you don’t:

  • Share what you heard
  • Acknowledge what was difficult
  • Explain what will change
  • And what can’t change (and why)

You won’t build trust — you’ll quietly erode it.

People don’t expect perfection.
They do expect:

  • Honesty
  • Visibility
  • Follow-through

The bottom line

Listening circles and focus groups don’t fix culture on their own.

But when done well — and when combined with performance data, wellbeing metrics, engagement scores and insights from one-to-ones — they can:

  • Reveal what’s really driving sickness absence and burnout
  • Surface invisible barriers to performance
  • Show where internal culture can be improved
  • Expose where systems — not people — are the issue
  • And rebuild trust where it’s been damaged

Whether you run them internally, bring in an external partner like Ridgeflow Performance, or train facilitators across your organisation, the principles stay the same:

Psychological safety first. Clear intent. Skilled facilitation. Data-informed design. And meaningful action afterwards.

Without those, it’s just another survey people learn to ignore.

About the author:

Khalil Rener is the founder of Ridgeflow Performance and a top-tier leadership consultant, performance coach, and wellbeing expert. With a BSc and MSc in Sport and Exercise Science from Loughborough University, his work focuses on applying the principles of elite sport to help people and teams thrive at work. Khalil has supported organisations including DP World, Novartis, the NHS, JT Global, NatWest, Sport England, and many more—from global companies to schools, councils, and frontline teams. His breadth of experience spans industries, team sizes, and career stages, from senior leaders to students and early-career professionals.

You might also like:

LATEST Poll

sponsored by
FEATURED
Review Your Cart
0
Add Coupon Code
Subtotal

 
Logo

Sign up to receive Make A Difference's fortnightly round up of features, news, reports, case studies, practical tools and more for employers who want to make a difference to work culture, mental health and wellbeing.